Yup, it's a great read and a great decision. Here for example is the context for the "favorite part" Rebelgecko mentions.
First, the transcript of the routine:
Believe me, even woke people kind of hate Muslims don’t they? Yup. “Refugees are welcome…to start treating their women a little better.” Wait, it is true that like women are treated a little better in the west for a while. After like 35, 40 it gets pretty brutal, doesn’t it? There’s no retirement age for looking hot in the west. That’s why you see American grandmas wearing makeup and shit. American women have to be as fuckable as possible until they’re dead, which I don’t think is fair. Y'all I want to start a rescue charity that helps women of a certain age move to Saudi Arabia. They’re gonna be like, “What, I don’t gotta to do botox or dye my hair?” I’m like, “Lady, you don’t even gotta drive. In fact, yeah, they prefer you didn’t.”
And here's the analysis:
The first half is hardly inflammatory, suggesting that Americans encourage Muslim
refugees to treat their women better, and that women in the west are generally treated better than
in Muslim countries, at least for a while. Grievant then opines that after a woman in the U.S.
becomes 35 or 40, it gets “pretty brutal,” which is provocative but cannot be interpreted as
inflammatory. He then states that older women in America are expected to continue looking
“hot,” resulting in American grandmothers wearing “makeup and shit.” So far, it cannot be
interpreted as inflammatory. He then states: “American women have to be as fuckable as
possible until they’re dead, which I don’t think is fair.” Although the first clause is debatable and
grossly articulated, the second clause plainly states that Grievant believes it to be unfair, so any
claim that the clip shows him to be demeaning women in the clip, as charged by management, is
patently unfair and untrue. On the other hand, the use of the word “fuckable” when applied to
elderly women approaching their grave can be interpreted as mildly inflammatory.
The final few sentences in which he proposes starting a charity to help women move to
Saudi Arabia, where they do not have to use botox or dye their hair and they are encouraged not
to drive cannot be interpreted as inflammatory and are simply funny.
It's not nearly as bad as America, though. Once you're married you graduate into a different social role where your appearance doesn't matter much. I don't think any of my aunties have ever been to a gym, went on a diet, etc. When your doctor warns you about diabetes you start going on walks and trying to cut down on your rice portions.
As an Irishman, I don’t normally like – or get – American stand-up (much prefer British ans Irish comedians) but that routine was both clever and funny. I literally laughed out loud while reading.
I also love how the analyst is trying to be objective as possible and their own dry delivery makes it all twice as funny.
First, the transcript of the routine:
Believe me, even woke people kind of hate Muslims don’t they? Yup. “Refugees are welcome…to start treating their women a little better.” Wait, it is true that like women are treated a little better in the west for a while. After like 35, 40 it gets pretty brutal, doesn’t it? There’s no retirement age for looking hot in the west. That’s why you see American grandmas wearing makeup and shit. American women have to be as fuckable as possible until they’re dead, which I don’t think is fair. Y'all I want to start a rescue charity that helps women of a certain age move to Saudi Arabia. They’re gonna be like, “What, I don’t gotta to do botox or dye my hair?” I’m like, “Lady, you don’t even gotta drive. In fact, yeah, they prefer you didn’t.”
And here's the analysis:
The first half is hardly inflammatory, suggesting that Americans encourage Muslim refugees to treat their women better, and that women in the west are generally treated better than in Muslim countries, at least for a while. Grievant then opines that after a woman in the U.S. becomes 35 or 40, it gets “pretty brutal,” which is provocative but cannot be interpreted as inflammatory. He then states that older women in America are expected to continue looking “hot,” resulting in American grandmothers wearing “makeup and shit.” So far, it cannot be interpreted as inflammatory. He then states: “American women have to be as fuckable as possible until they’re dead, which I don’t think is fair.” Although the first clause is debatable and grossly articulated, the second clause plainly states that Grievant believes it to be unfair, so any claim that the clip shows him to be demeaning women in the clip, as charged by management, is patently unfair and untrue. On the other hand, the use of the word “fuckable” when applied to elderly women approaching their grave can be interpreted as mildly inflammatory.
The final few sentences in which he proposes starting a charity to help women move to Saudi Arabia, where they do not have to use botox or dye their hair and they are encouraged not to drive cannot be interpreted as inflammatory and are simply funny.