Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The problem is not a personal hardware security module, as you noted we have them. The problem is that people want redundancy that undermines the point. If you can easily have a copy of your ring just in case, how do you know who has done that process and watches you all the time? Biometrics sounds like a solution yet they are implemented as a cosmetic security layer and this situation is pointless to fix since we leave them everywhere we go.


if people want to copy then let them copy

-how is that secure????

we would let only 1 device active at a time

if you think secure enclave with Biometric security is "weak" then no one is secure

if you think combination of (fingerprint,DNA,blood variance,retina, star time + position, mental memory etc) is not enough then no one is enough

(we are assuming this is future where we can access all this technology) << this is important point here

also if this is not enough, ppffttt (I dont want to go here) Neuralink device that lives under your skin




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: