Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Google suggests a whopping 15% if SF homes are empty.

London by comparison is about 2.5%

Why is SFs figure so high. Why are people holding on to unproductive assets, paying to maintain them.



Empty means no permanent tenant means airbnb


That’s included in londons 2.5%

Dies SF have limits on rents that can be charged?


I hesitate because there's not a lot of data out there. Are those being measured the same way? Are they even real measurements and not just repeated talking points...?


Maybe land banking?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: