Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

They contain training data and a statistical model that might generate something true or it might generate garbage, both with equal confidence. You need to already know the answer to determine which is which.


Have you actually used Claude Opus 4.1? It is right far more than it is wrong.


How could you know?


How do you react to comments like this?

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44980896#44980913

I believe it absolutely should be, and it can even be applied to rare disease diagnosis.

My child was just saved by AI. He suffered from persistent seizures, and after visiting three hospitals, none were able to provide an accurate diagnosis. Only when I uploaded all of his medical records to an AI system did it immediately suggest a high suspicion of MOGAD-FLAMES — a condition with an epidemiology of roughly one in ten million.

Subsequent testing confirmed the diagnosis, and with the right treatment, my child recovered rapidly.

For rare diseases, it is impossible to expect every physician to master all the details. But AI excels at this. I believe this may even be the first domain where both doctors and AI can jointly agree that deployment is ready to begin.


How can you?


Because I don't rely on a glorified text generator for what's true lol




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: