His reaction to this incident as being a sort of targeted hit piece towards him specifically was utter paranoid nonsense and just really made him look full of shit from an outside perspective. Further, authors of the piece received countless death threats from a mob of angry redditors with no real insight other than "someone got doxxed?!?! HOW DARE THEY!!!" (a narrative which I personally fell victim to before reading the actual article). Scott did nothing to remedy this situation and perhaps even fanned the flames a good deal.
More people should read the article, if anything because it provides interesting insight into Sam Altman's shady behavior.
Have you ever had random people harass you and threaten violence towards you in heavy numbers? No amount of resolve will keep that from being a deeply stressful situation.
I don't doubt it's not fun, but I also don't think that either you or Mr Metz really give a shit. Rather, you like to bandy about this harassment as proof that your opponents are evil (of course, when it's your opponents being harassed, then that's a sort of divine punishment, and hence also proof that they're evil). If it were any other way, then you wouldn't particularly bring it up in reference to scott, since there isn't much of anything scott can do about other people committing harassment. Furthermore, you might express a degree of sympathy for his efforts to avoid harassment by not having his dox published in the nyt, rather than indignantly expounding on your god given right to publish whatever you feel like.
More people should read the article, if anything because it provides interesting insight into Sam Altman's shady behavior.
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/13/technology/slate-star-cod...