> All things I have no control over, but they ultimately do.
What things are you referring to?
> Parents aren’t children, they’re _responsible_ for children.
Yes. You appear to be saying they should rip their children from generations of stability and possibly landing in a worse living situation for awhile as they now have to find new jobs and spent money they didn't have -- not referring to families that can afford this, but the many many who vote, yet can not afford to move and those who could move but not without incurring long lasting economical damage -- because the current group of lawmakers want to dump fracking water in the rivers? Is providing stability for children not also the responsibility of parents? How do you propose they do both at the same time?
What things are you referring to?
> Parents aren’t children, they’re _responsible_ for children.
Yes. You appear to be saying they should rip their children from generations of stability and possibly landing in a worse living situation for awhile as they now have to find new jobs and spent money they didn't have -- not referring to families that can afford this, but the many many who vote, yet can not afford to move and those who could move but not without incurring long lasting economical damage -- because the current group of lawmakers want to dump fracking water in the rivers? Is providing stability for children not also the responsibility of parents? How do you propose they do both at the same time?