Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Plenty of people make a business out of advertising on those platforms, so I don't see why not.

You could make an argument that Facebook doesn't really sort or categorise products by their properties, but eBay definitely does. You could also make an argument that Facebook isn't a middle man in the transaction because payment doesn't go through Facebook (unless you pick a payment option that does, of course).

I think you can defend Facebook Marketplace, but not eBay. When I use eBay, I don't wire money to John Stevens, I pay eBay directly.

eBay wants a cut, that means eBay gets part of the responsibilities too. Not for everything, of course, and they can always hold the seller accountable when those responsibilities become a problem.



FB marketplace listings are free and for a single item.

Ads are paid and meant to run for a very long time.

They’re not comparable in any way. If you forced marketplace sellers to the same review standards as ad buyers, it would become expensive and difficult to list things. The number of listings would collapse. People would be frustrated because they can’t buy cheap things second hand like they did in the past.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: