Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Hyundai for the win.

They do use touch screen functions --- but mainly for setup and configuration --- not for basic controls while driving.

It's illegal to use a touch screen phone while driving in many areas --- and for good reasons. So why is it ok and legal for manufacturers to mandate the use of their built-in touch screen while driving? Seems contradictory to me.



Tho most of the “physical buttons” on my Hyundai are non-tactile, capacitive buttons.

I love my Ioniq I think a lot of ways it’s a better package than Tesla’s but I still miss the physical buttons from my Honda. I can’t get close to a button and find the right one by feel when it’s a capacitive panel


I haven't driven an Ioniq yet but it sounds like they too may have taken a turn down the wrong path.

I regularly drive a fairly new Elantra where all the essential driving controls are still physical with tactile feedback.

My favorite is the environmental control. A single, big easy to find knob to adjust the temperature without your eyes leaving the road. Turn left (counter-clockwise) for colder, right for hotter. The car takes it from there and selects heat or a/c as needed with an appropriate fan speed. You can still adjust manually but I rarely do so.


The '25 ioniq 5's bring a lot of the buttons back. The climate ones are capacative, but are dedicated buttons.


Yep - people think of Tesla first for EV's, but (for the overall package) Hyundai are far ahead.

Emphasis on 'overall package'


Mazda as well


This! I love the UX in my Mazda 6.


+1 for Mazda. And also for keeping an actual shifter instead of knobs or buttons.


Last gen Hondas have physical buttons, also the volume and temperature knobs click when rotated. The screen has physical back and home buttons too.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: