You're ignoring the problem I mentioned above. That's not a solution, just pretending the system you envision is viable. Let's look at the problem and make it viable.

I'd consider it an improvement over the current situation, where discourse is drowned in a sea of sanctionable incivility. Technology that has made spreading the shit easier needs to be matched by technology to control the shit.

If you support them taking someone else's speech away, what will they say when the come for you? What will anyone else say?

I support taking away noxious speech that was never protected.

Do you support violations of law if people can get away with them?