I have come to the point that it is not really fair to the LLM to statistically train it on human output and expect it to come up with something more than the average.

There will be much value in automating the tedious and the routine.

Of course, that doesn't make for a great science fiction story. We first have to placate all these science fiction fantasies and in the process we will automate the tedious and the routine as a side effect of trying to figure out how many AGI can dance on the head of a pin.

Then human creativity will just be worth all the more.