while commendable on Signal's part, i think the more surefire route is to forego Giphy's service altogether. GIFs truly are fun, especially when you capture that perfect non-written/verbal message—but it's simply not worth it to me and worth too much to Giphy.
I wonder how many “partners” Google or Microsoft have? Their legalese probably doesn’t say it explicitly and probably use some loop hole through a data broker.
Google -> data broker (1) -> 1000 “partners” or affiliates
I don't understand why it's such a big deal that "other companies have my data"
What data? Where I live? My phone number? My interests (that I typed in online)? What kind of products I like (that I scrolled slowly past/engaged with)?
Where does the narrative come that "I as a user deserve to use all of these platforms for free and I don't want them or any of their marketing partners to have 'data' on me"
Who cares? Why do people become so obsessed with protecting their 'data'? What makes you so special? They go through great lengths to avoid it. How does it affect your life knowing other companies have 'data' on you?
If you want insurance, insurance providers literally need data on you. Same for credit with banks/lenders. Same for renters/landlords, etc.
But we draw the line on "big tech" social media?... Why? Where is the negative harm?
It's all fun and games until your data gets used against you. But by then it's too late.
There are many historical examples, but a great contemporary example is states using this data so they can prosecute you if your pregnancy ends[1]. In general private collection of data should be regarded the same as government collection of the same data, since all this data is subject to subpoena.
Yes--which is why you should never use your normal system for anything you don't want connected to you. Take precautions when virtually approaching an abortion clinic like you would take precautions when approaching a physical one.
I simply assume Big Data (government or not) will be aware of pretty much anything I do unless I use a separate browser and a VPN. Think of it as a public space--if someone cares to look, they can.
I think we're only worried about our data in the hands of governments. So maybe we should make that illegal - but of course governments would never pass a law like that, against their own interest...
Spying on people is just generally creepy, I don’t know, but I bet if I was hanging around outside in your bushes with some binoculars, you’d have some entirely reasonable questions for me.
It is also bad to contribute to this ecosystem, you and I might be boring people with nothing to hide. But, there exist lots of vulnerable people out there, and we should not provide a market for services that make it easier to infer things about them.
Unfortunately it is hard to compete with “free*.” So, these spying companies have gained a dominant position in the market. It is, I think, generally accepted that it is fine to regulate entities with dominant market positions.
It's not a big deal if other companies have your data. You're free not to value your private life, but please don't extrapolate to other people.
What data? Where I live? My phone number?
Which people you interact with, and which people you'd go to great lengths for to help them. Where you sleep, and at what time you wake up. When you're at home, and when it's safe to ransack your house. What your pressure points are for manipulation. What route your children use to go to school. What ransom money you'd be able to pay out-of-pocket.
Let me get this straight: you're afraid people would rob/kidnap you or your children using data stored by the Big Tech?!
Any instance when this actually happened? Would't it be easier to just watch your house for a week from a parked car, wireless camera let on some wall?
As you exploratory search for medical symptoms for a friend or a pet and your life / car insurance renewal is affected by risk factors derived from the selling of your data.
When you visit a news publication and a third party does a soft credit check to categorise your session in user groups.
Actually there are application forms for this, there is no need to shoulder surf that.
You don't have to type stuff into a Facebook.com input form for them to be able to use it for ad targeting. There are Facebook "share" buttons on most websites, and each of these is a tracking beacon that tells Facebook that User X visited so-and-so website. That X becomes an identifiable user if the user is logged into Facebook on the same browser at the time of the website visit.
Why don't they just advertise based on relevancy to search/topic/etc, instead they want to build a psychological profile on me. I can't stop them with a request or take down, so I do the next possible thing, make it as hard as possible to track me. I'm probably losing but it's still fun to try. Why do I owe random companies my life story? The whole "what do you have to hide?" and "think of the children!" has been used for centuries by authoritarians to control society.
It's even weirder when people seemingly forget their self-preservation instincts to go on the internet and simp for Big Tech.
C'mon, y'all, Elon Musk, The Zuck, Henry Kissinger - these people work very hard to give us the lifestyle we want. The least we can do is give them a little of our data, if not our money. Right? Right?
I, for one, am honored that my every interaction is stored in some datacenter in northern Utah. It just makes me feel safe at night.
Actually, they do. Companies and their employees all over the world are giving us the products and services we want. In exchange we're freely giving them our money and/or some "data".
When offered the choice, it seems most people would rather pay with their data. We've been told for years now this is not good for us, but I am still waiting to see the downsides - all I get are some personalised ads.
It’s hard to notice because the effects are insidious and very slow.
What does happen is they sell your data to companies or foreign governments that have absolutely zero interest in you or your families welfare and use it to craft policy to further entrench themselves.
If you are waiting for evidence that is extremely black and white and personalized like an attack that simply is not gonna happen.
Take tiktok for example
Tiktok gathers data on US demographics to steer discussion and politics or sow discourse. Watching tiktok videos you probably aren’t thinking, wow China really wants to see the west fall. Only if you understand their foreign policy would you connect the dots. rest assured they are using everything available to them to do so.
> What does happen is they sell your data to companies
I don't know, more personalized ads?!
> foreign governments
> Take tiktok for example
TikTok's is a foreign government operation.
> steer discussion and politics or sow discourse
I am still waiting for proof they can actually do that. I remember all the scandal around Cambridge Analytica but then nobody said anything anymore when it turned out they weren't able to do what they boasted they could.
Yes, we should be afraid of governments getting our data and using it against us. But they have many other ways of getting the data and they don't exactly obey laws - they are above the law by definition. So I don't see how laws against private companies can help here.
Insurance companies and the like don't need these backdoor data brokers (at least for legit needs), because they can just go through legit channels. What legitimate need would a bank or insurance broker have for your IP address history, or secret fine geolocation history, or browsing history, or product interest?
Plenty of illegitimate reasons though, eh?
The data brokers being discussed are huge problem because companies (and nations) use this information - both individually, and in aggregate - to work against your and our interests, and into theirs. This data is valuable because it is NOT going through legitimate, constrained channels.
And even if you think 'nothing bad could happen' with the current administration, what if Trump wins again? Because that is not a zero probability event.
And that is without counting that Russia and China are of course using these same data brokers for their purposes right now, and will do so during the coming elections too. They would be fools not to, they'll just get better at not getting caught like they did last time.
This isn't hypothetical slippery slope stuff either - this is the norm now.
These brokers are for the low-quality-but-useful-directionally 'protected' data which legit channels aren't allowed to have for very good reasons. There aren't 300+ 'big tech' entities.
Like religious/political affiliations (a Jew? Muslim? Democrat in a Red state, Conservative in a Blue one), gender/sex/whatever (LGBTQ or not - both are hot button right now depending on where you live), porn browsing habits, illegal-drug-site-habits, trying-to-get-an-abortion browsing, do-you-have-a-girlfriend on the side location data, or are-you-working-during-work-hours browsing data, etc.
These things can and do get people targeted and/or killed, depending on where they live and their personal situation. If you don't have to worry about it, congrats - but a large portion (probably most) of society does or will at some point.
The low data quality is just as likely to get you personally targeted too for something you aren't, and good luck disproving it, since the folks looking at the data aren't really supposed to even have it to begin with.
In many cases it is as 'benign' as getting you to pay for something you otherwise wouldn't, even if you can't afford it.
In others, it is directing targeted propaganda at you to influence your core political beliefs, incite rage, manipulate emotions and behaviors, and influence your personal and professional activities in ways that are often against your individual interests. In many cases, against our societies interests too.
Hell, at one point on Youtube I clicked on some random video and got targeted with a super manipulative female voiced 'do girls laugh at you because your dick is too small?' ad.
I've also seen 'Girlfriend, your makeup is ugly and that is why guys think you're a Ho, buy our product' ads too.
That wording is not hyperbole either. The voice acting was even more impressively manipulative.
If I could have gotten a recording of it, you would not be saying what you're saying right now.
And those are far from the only malicious ads out there. The entire population is being bombarded with them. Many of the political ads even have outright falsehoods in them.
I've also seen the ads and videos Trumpers get - from insane conspiracy theory to barely couched calls for political violence. I've had people try to connect with me on the political violence front in person twice in one area near California. And not in a 'hah, what nutjobs' kind of way, but in a 'hey man, you prepared for shit getting real?' serious kind of way. And yes, they had access to firearms.
I'm sure somewhere, someone is thinking up how to do a blackmail-styled 'we know you watch bestiality-granny-incest porn, pay up for our protection plan or we'll email the proof to your parents' ads, if they haven't already figured it out.
I also have an acquaintance in a conservative area all the sudden start learning how to speak Russian. She knows no Russians, and has no plans to visit Russia. If that doesn't raise red flags in this environment, you're not paying attention.
Personally, while manipulative dick size jabs or calls to doomsday conspiracy theories and violence are not anything that triggers more than an eyebrow raise from me, near as I can tell 95%~ of the population doesn't have the experience and whatever-else-you-call-it someone like me has to be able to just laugh and walk away. Or tell when they actually want something, vs when they are being manipulated to want something.
Those that can, probably paid in blood and treasure. I know I did. You probably don't want to know what it takes to get there, and it doesn't scale to the level of a society.
And with every platform actively fighting adblockers, and mobile ad blocking being... not good? This is not going to be pretty.
Population wise though, barring some kind of dictatorship (which would likely just make it worse), I guess we'll all have to figure it out, or be crushed. Or toss our phones in the trash, I guess.
Are you so insulated you don't see this harm happening?
If so, I recommend you hit up youtube or facebook in a clean browser and do some searching around. It won't take long for concerning things to start coming your way, regardless of what gender/sex/political affiliation you are, though I'd recommend going outside of your normal path so you can see the crazy in a clearer fashion. It's easy to get frog boiled if we don't change things up.
I have yet to go long in ANY direction though without getting whacked by something clearly manipulative.
And if you have seen these things, why would you not care about this?
Because it is an existential threat to everyone. Regardless of how tough any individual is at dealing with this, no man is an island. At least Nazi, USSR, and similar propaganda had to attempt to deal with population wide Overton window type constraints, so it could only be so aggressive.
These situations are closer to having your own NKVD 'friend' following you around all day with a detailed file from the Stasi.
It is already not going well for people's mental health or Society, and it will get worse.
I’d argue ‘it depends on the times and the circumstances’.
There is no one right answer.
Several things however are clear - most people are NOT having a good time, this isn’t a hypothetical situation anymore, and there are real consequences building for everyone.
Could ‘yeah whatever who cares’ work out the best?
It’s not impossible. But I’d argue if you did a decent gut check the vast majority of people will not agree that’s going to happen in the current circumstances. It’s certainly what the polls are telling us.
There are far too many clear predators out and about, and they’re succeeding far too much.
The challenge is that the predators are successful because they’re getting so good at creating noise and bullshit and pushing peoples buttons - because of the data they have and everyone being overwhelmed.
More like "You can pay us to use the personal information to get the ad to the groups you want. But we're not going to share the information, because it's our advantage over you"
This is quite a misleading comment IMO. You don't "pay" donations, you make them. There is no exchange and no debts are settled. And wikipedia isn't a "product" in the usual sense of a commercial product.
How is it that no one has come up with a way to easily inform the user/customer what is being collected and for what?
My initial thought would be something along the lines of providing like an ingredients label for food but for data collected from web pages.
That would help inform the user what exactly and how pervasive the data they are collecting rather than bucketing it under a common term such as the “data”
application services should provide User accounts with exactly what about them was collected and stored in an account summary and ideally if they sold it how much they made off of it as well
Giphy also does not have a privacy policy for their Firefox extension, but run an analytics script, which I wrote about and sent them an email to which they ignored me despite sending conformation of receiving it.
No way to know the data being collected, or opt out.
I occasionally post a meme GIF in my posts, and I had been downloading the ones I wanted from Giphy and Tenor and hosting the file on my site… definitely glad I did that instead of unknowingly generating profit for a company simply by having visitors on my site.
Second order effect of forcing a sale by Meta. At least they would have kept the data from getting shared with 800+ data brokers with who knows what kind of security and decency practices.
Wouldn't one have to agree to the cookies on Giphy site for the data to be shared? There's no such possibility in Slack, so I'd assume different T&C apply here.
With 3rd party cookies going away, a lot of companies are relying on ipv4 and ipv6 hashes to correlate users across sites with first party cookies.
In other words, if Giphy has your email and IP address, they can help companies like LinkedIn and other brokers de-anonymize IP addresses more accurately with higher percent accuracy.
ISPs could mitigate this by rotating IPs every week, but of course you typically get 1 IP and it rarely changes.
At least in Germany this is only somewhat true on fiber. Most cable/DSL has been on dynamic assignment forever, and some are even on CGNAT for IPv4 now.
IPs are shitty stable identifiers - and yet, before we got a static IP with our fiber provider, the neighbors YouTube recommendations leaked into our own.
I noticed with LinkedIn they send 1 tracking request with a hash of your ipv4, then the request 302’s to a 2nd API that sends the ipv4 hash together with the ipv6 hash (along with your email if the advertiser provides it in the tracking code). My ISP is also dynamic assignment but it never changes, so basically it’s static.
It’s definitely not a good stable identifier. But when you combine enough signals like that (plus screen size, geo ip, ISP provider, etc..) you can get pretty close to being just as accurate (or even more accurate) compared to 3rd party cookies.
Even if your IP changes once a day, that might be enough to keep your profile connected if you use LinkedIn, Facebook, Giphy, etc on a daily basis. Another benefit of this over 3rd party cookies is easier cross-device tracking.
The whole phasing out of 3rd party cookies might be a net negative for privacy because it forces advertisers to send even more data to ad networks in the never ending pursuit of view/click to conversion attribution.
Without 3rd party cookies, the best way to track conversions is to give Google/Linkedin/etc your name/email/phone/mailing address so they can try to map your clicks to the conversion indirectly without cookies.
No 3rd party cookies = huge catalyst for data broker industry.
Wow. Giphy must have drastically changed since my last interactions with the dev team ~2016. Back then they actually went out of their way to respond to (and fix!) my bug reports for obscure Firefox forks. I was really impressed with them.
The natural lifecycle of free image hosts is well known and short though. Enshittification is inevitable.
This should come as a surprise to no one. Any platform returning a whole webpage with a prominent "download our app" button when you try loading a direct link to a .gif is clearly up to some major bs.
That's why we share every little piece of data we get on you with our 816 partners and give them full permission to do with it whatever the hell they want, including resell it to their thousands of partners. For your convenience, we have installed state of the art surveillance technology in your home so we can watch you eat, sleep, take a shower as well as record every other event of interest.
For your safety, our associates undertake regular visits to your registered address to open and thoroughly check all your mail before it reaches you and share every bit of info found it in with all of our partners.
In my personal (empty) blog my privacy statement starts with: "Unlike all others I do not value your privacy."
I will just paste the rest of the whole privacy statement here:
This website does not collect any personal information about visitors. My server is configured to not keep any logs, except for error logs, which do not include IP addresses.
This is the whole content of my privacy page. 25+ pages that other websites use, i managed to shorten to 2 lines.
When I looked at privacy policies, I rarely found the "We value your privacy" line in privacy policies that seem to treat your personal data with care.
Or once could say, "Rest assured, as we gradually erode the sanctity of your privacy, the time will come when all interested parties will have sufficiently profiled you. Eventually, you will be distilled into a simple element within a behavioural prediction model. At that point, we will be anticipating your actions even before you are aware of them. Then you won't have to worry about being watched."
Even when I pay, I still get monitored. Supposedly more so as I have identified myself as someone with resources. Are there any services which shut down analytics if I start paying?
Cars, TVs, streaming boxes, whatever. Physical devices for which I spend money, but the vendor still thinks they are entitled to know my every move.
It's time we start charging big for this negative externality of modern capitalism.
By the way, if our data is worth money then companies using our data without consent are stealing from us in the same sense that piracy or patent infringement is stealing. Big corporations cannot have it both ways.
> if our data is worth money then companies using our data without consent are stealing from us
By that reasoning Pepsi is stealing unsatisfied customers from Coca-Cola and should be put in jail. In other words, I don't think this is how capitalism works.
If there is valid consideration its not unjust enrichment. And the bar for valid consideration is a low one. Any This for that exchange will satisfy this requirement.
"In exchange for providing you this nearly worthless meme graphic someone else made, you give us panoptic access to your private online activities."
In a way that doesn't violate privacy and security. If they can't, they shouldn't be in business the same way a cereal company that cuts their product with dirt or sawdust shouldn't be in business.
By starting to charge money. Maybe not realistic right now because of the competition, but I'm sure it would look different if privacy abuse was illegal and everyone had to adapt.
I imagine media properties could pay Giphy to promote gifs of their properties. Probably wouldn't be that bad of an advertising strategy for a new release!
