Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'm curious, why L2 norm? Each qubit lives in C^2, does it not? I've only ever seen quantum computing formulated over finite dimensional Hilbert spaces (though to be fair it was only in a math context, no real physics there)


We can't have a why, because the claim that the norm is L2 is axiomatic [1]. However, as the sibling comment notes, we can argue from consistency. Would any other norm give us a sensible theory? Or we can put quantum theory in a larger framework of theories and discuss why the L2 norm makes more sense within that framework. Scott Aaronson discusses some of these idea in his lecture [2].

[1] Feynamn on why https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=36GT2zI8lVA&pp=ygULZmV5bm1hb...

[2] https://www.scottaaronson.com/democritus/lec9.html


Real probabilities sum to 1 additively. Complex amplitudes don't. The L2 norm preserves unitarity.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: