Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> You haven't. People aren't. This is a hypothetical that isn't the reality, and an irrelevant distraction.

How can you be so sure? If one day comes a 100% reliable way to detect all AI-generated responses, how can you be sure that also the good ones won't get deleted in one major sweep?

Yes, I see there are many people who despise the AI generated spam on many sites. But nothing you posted proves that all (I'd even say, "significant portion of") AI generated content is spam.

I don't see anything wrong letting the AI generate an answer and edit the rough/wrong parts if necessary.



> I don't see anything wrong letting the AI generate an answer and edit the rough/wrong parts if necessary.

And this is not what the previous moderation policy was trying to prevent. What it was trying to prevent is answers from people skip that second step.


I was opposing to this part:

> "But what if they were correct answers?" is largely an irrelevant hypothetical side-issue.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: