Any study that "slams" decades of research needs to be reproduced or independent... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		scoofy on Nov 18, 2022 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Red meat is not a health risk. New study slams yea... Any study that "slams" decades of research needs to be reproduced or independently reanalyzed (for meta-analysis) before I take it seriously. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

martin82 on Nov 19, 2022 [–]

What if the "extraordinary evidence" that is the foundation of your current dogma is the culmination of several decades of "science" that got corrupted by big money?

scoofy on Nov 19, 2022 | [–]

Then entire point of science is reproducibility. If it's true, it's reproducible.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact