Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Neimann has already admitted to cheating in the past, so that claim is dead.


>I believe that Niemann has cheated more - and more recently - than he has publicly admitted.

Plus, a very strong implication thag he did so at the Sinquefield Cup.

Neimann may have something.


You're allowed to make "very strong implications". The other word for that is "opinion". You're in trouble if you say "I've been given secret information that shows Neimann cheated at the Cup", but if all you're saying is "based on these factors, which by implication you yourself could evaluate, I believe he's cheating", you're offering an opinion based on disclosed facts, and that defamation claim won't survive dismissal.

(I'm not a lawyer, I just nerd out on this stuff, happy to be corrected).




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: