From 2007 (please fix headline). Abstract asks "has the bicameral model withstood the test of time?" and describes the types of studies they did to address this question. The abstract doesn't give or really hint at the answer. At least from a 2022 perspective, that is clickbait, lol. I'll take a look at the article but would rather have the abstract actually summarize the paper, as abstracts are supposed to do.
The space between the concept of a recently evolved bicameral mind and the last sentence: “Finally, the concept of a non-unitary Self is presented as one of the most relevant contemporary legacies of the bicameral mind.” should give you a pretty good hint where they end up — quite some distance away.
