Nobody is saying what he’s being censored for, and I don’t care to graze videos to find out. If it’s religious in nature, that’s a topic that can (easily) piss people off. Particularly if done in a “comparative” approach. YouTube exists by selling ads and keeping viewers so they have to be careful with anything more controversial than kittens and huskies.

> Nobody is saying what he’s being censored for

In the first 3 minutes of the video:

"I interviewed the friend of a girl who had been murdered by her family in an honor killing, that video was banned, for hate speech. I made a video condemning cartoon killings - banned for hate speech. I made a video criticizing the British legal system for helping child traffickers - banned for hate speech. I've made several videos criticizing the persecution of Hindus - those are always fine. I've made several videos criticizing the persecution of Muslims - those are always fine. But I've been repeatedly banned for posting videos of persecution of Christians in places like Pakistan - Youtube just doesn't want me talking about it. [..] Meanwhile if you're a popular youtuber calling for the execution of ex-Muslims, you're fine on youtube <example video shown>. If you're a sheikh, telling your followers to prepare for the future when they'll go door to door, giving people the option to convert, pay protection money, or be murdered, you're fine on Youtube <example video shown>."

This fellow is not alone. I remember when YouTube censorship was unbelievably rare. Now I run into censorship every week.

That doesn't mean one should keep quiet about hypocritical censorship.

Besides, he's not claiming that what youtube is doing is illegal, so arguing that there's no right to a platform is arguing against a strawman.