You're right, but my point is that by slightly relaxing the physical criteria, you get a wider selection of personalities.
For example, it's ridiculous to ask for an exact height. Height is a spectrum. By demanding 6" or taller, you can't seriously justify how somebody that is 5"9 is an absolute deal breaker.
Similarly, if you're not attracted to fat people, you could still consider somebody a little overweight. Weight is not a static quality.
You may be attracted to brunettes, but I would opt to see that as a preference, not a hard requirement.
My point is that "attractive enough" is a better strategy as all of these things are ultimately unimportant if the personality doesn't match.
For example, it's ridiculous to ask for an exact height. Height is a spectrum. By demanding 6" or taller, you can't seriously justify how somebody that is 5"9 is an absolute deal breaker.
Similarly, if you're not attracted to fat people, you could still consider somebody a little overweight. Weight is not a static quality.
You may be attracted to brunettes, but I would opt to see that as a preference, not a hard requirement.
My point is that "attractive enough" is a better strategy as all of these things are ultimately unimportant if the personality doesn't match.