It's not a charitable interpretation, but not true? I dunno. That BI article probably wouldn't still be up, or would have had a stern talking-to from Twitter's lawyers, if it were just not true.
Twitter isn't the most egregious actor (looking at you, Meta, and you, YouTube team at Alphabet), but the rhetoric of "white supremacists should not be welcomed in the public discourse" is both true and helpful. It's an effective North Star.
"In their moral justification, the argument of the lesser evil has played a prominent role. If you are confronted with two evils, the argument runs, it is your duty to opt for the lesser one, whereas it is irresponsible to refuse to choose altogether. Its weakness has always been that those who choose the lesser evil forget quickly that they chose evil." -Hannah Arendt
Twitter isn't the most egregious actor (looking at you, Meta, and you, YouTube team at Alphabet), but the rhetoric of "white supremacists should not be welcomed in the public discourse" is both true and helpful. It's an effective North Star.
"In their moral justification, the argument of the lesser evil has played a prominent role. If you are confronted with two evils, the argument runs, it is your duty to opt for the lesser one, whereas it is irresponsible to refuse to choose altogether. Its weakness has always been that those who choose the lesser evil forget quickly that they chose evil." -Hannah Arendt