I think paper titles should be as thoroughly reviewed as their content. This goes for almost all psychology papers. Researchers should not generalize their results haphazardly.
In this particular case, they have only looked at two particular video games. And yet they claim that video game play is correlated with well-being.
I know that the title is technically correct but if you always have to resort to such cheap tactics to make your research seem relevant then the entire field should be put into question.
There is no way you'd find a paper in CS titled "An optimal solution to the Traveling Salesman Problem" when the paper has only solved a constrained, limited version of the problem.
In this particular case, they have only looked at two particular video games. And yet they claim that video game play is correlated with well-being.
I know that the title is technically correct but if you always have to resort to such cheap tactics to make your research seem relevant then the entire field should be put into question.
There is no way you'd find a paper in CS titled "An optimal solution to the Traveling Salesman Problem" when the paper has only solved a constrained, limited version of the problem.