I think the summary is pretty honest and reflects the current implementation and what could be expected from FLoC.
FLoC's draft does not offer a solution for sensitive information. It merely suggests a first step, filtering some obviously sensitive information, that is not implemented in the current experiment.
About the code I looked hard, and the fact that I couldn't find how sensitive information is handled by FLoC in an open-source implementation is interesting. Either it's not there, or it's very hidden which is not good either.
You didn't comment about using the community efforts to block ads to track people.
I'm sorry the post didn't match your expectations.
FLoC's draft does not offer a solution for sensitive information. It merely suggests a first step, filtering some obviously sensitive information, that is not implemented in the current experiment.
About the code I looked hard, and the fact that I couldn't find how sensitive information is handled by FLoC in an open-source implementation is interesting. Either it's not there, or it's very hidden which is not good either.
You didn't comment about using the community efforts to block ads to track people.
I'm sorry the post didn't match your expectations.