At first, I thought this meant languages where the programming symbols were limited in size to a single letter. I was simultaneously disappointed and relieved.
On Unix-like systems, you can't use '\0' in a path name. I think that's also the case on Windows. Nor can you use '/', so trying to use that as a file extension would be almost equally silly.
The website author suggests that V is still available since the language is in alpha. In that case, no, you'd better get on writing that interpreter / compiler if you don't want to get scooped.
The author asks why you would choose a programming language that is impossible to Google, but that's not quite correct: Google has no problem with "D language" or "J language".
The fact that people refer to google's own Go as golang relatively frequently indicates to me that googleable names are important.
These days when I use a language in a query it's usually in combination with something. I might not google go, but I might google go time...
which my test run indicates has an entirely different problem than what I expected, the results are go related - there is a go related podcast called GoTime, funnily enough.
But I've definitely needed to disambiguate programming technologies from entirely different contexts in some queries.
How often do you just Google the name of a programming language, anyway?
And you'd have the same problem if your language were named after a common word like Python or Java.
From about 2003 to 2012 or so I used LaTeX pretty frequently for typesetting and remember occasionally coming across some results that were about a different kind of latex. This doesn't seem to happen any more, from a quick test. But Google knows from my search history that I'm interested in math; a new user might have problems.
What is turbo and who is it named after? I know it's a name but I don't know of anyone with that name who is notable other than like one unpopular saint.
Cool article. I wish PL names were more imaginative in general: a single letter is so uninspiring. Naming after famous people (Pascal, Haskell, Ada, Erlang) isn't a bad idea. Failing that there are so many mythological or natural terms that would make good names. (I love how Docker and Kubernetes describe low-tech analogies, though I guess with languages they are harder to find.)
The D programming language was originally named Mars (after my company name Digital Mars). But my friends and colleagues kept jokingly calling it "D" to the point where reality was accepted.
Edit: and then I got to "O".