Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I call bullshit on this. 1000km range and 400km/h top speed?

Obviously you can't have both but each of this is unrealistic enough on its own.

You can't even go 400km/h on the Autobahn, which roads are they building this for?

And fully loaded SUVs like the Hyundai Kona get somewhat about 500km in normal crusing mode. 1000km is either a breakthrough in battery technology or measured/calculated when going 50km/h at best.

Unrealistic values imho, but I'm open to be proven otherwise.



>You can't even go 400km/h on the Autobahn, which roads are they building this for?

They're competing against ferrari/lamborghini/mclaren. The top speed is for the track, not the street. That should be quite obvious....

> I call bullshit on this. 1000km range and 400km/h top speed?

The range is clearly not based on going the top speed for the duration. The distance Tesla gives is typically based on a combined city/highway driving profile. They also provide calculators to estimate your range bssed on the mixture as well as a map program that tells you where you'd need to charge getting from point A to point B if you're going on a long-distance trip.

https://www.tesla.com/trips/


> You can't even go 400km/h on the Autobahn

Yes, you can actually: https://www.motor1.com/news/264061/bugatti-veyron-speed-reco...


Range is easy: just add more battery. It’s expensive, but this is an expensive car.


Speed / power is a similar affair; a bigger battery is essentially more battery cells, and more power. The increased weight doesn't significantly detract from top speed, as air resistance dominates. In fact, additional weight increases down-force on the road, and thus the maximum force the wheels can apply.


But space and weight are limited on a supercar. So you have to choose one.


Not if you’re battery-limited in performance. An ideal performance electric car is all battery and motor with the weight of everything else reduced as much as possible. That naturally means your battery will be way over-sized compared to a typical electric car.

Electric batteries are power-limited as well as energy-limited. So if you want more power, you need a bigger battery. (Alternate chemistries are also possible, but even then you reach a practical limit.)

The naive approach is to think of a battery like a gasoline tank, whose size and capacity you want to minimize if you’re going for performance records. But really it’s part of of the powertrain, and having a larger battery brings a bunch of other benefits like longer lifetime (in miles driven), charge & discharge speed (in kilowatts), higher thermal mass (can handle those big spurts of power that might temporarily exceed the cooling system’s capacity), and higher electrical efficiency at a given discharge speed (a larger battery at a given voltage has lower internal resistance, thus less resistive losses and less heat generation).


Space is no problem. Make the floor a bit thicker, done. Look at how much space the battery takes up in other Teslas... if you can find it.

Added weight is not desirable but it’s not a dealbreaker.


They have a lot to work with since their competitors have to carry V10, V12 and W16 engines


400 km/s is possible on the Autobahn ... but it is an exception.

1000km range at 100km/h maybe :D


> 400 km/s is possible on the Autobahn ... but it is an exception.

Voyager 1 hardly achieves 16.49 km/s. It seems strange that German engineering can achieve better from tarmac & ICE.

/snark




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: