Wow, maybe there is some truth to what the author claims and surely there are concerns with regard to the homeless, but credibility gets thin after the deluge of hyperbole and inflammatory language. In some circles this language soul be classified as "triggers".
If they have a point to make, it's easier to understand when the other side isn't so violently vilified.
I think it's also worth remembering that the opposite of gentrification is what you get in places like Detroit --and I don't see people clamoring to go to Detroit, physically or as a state of mind.
So we need a balance. We need policies which offer help to the homeless but also allow for progress which can sustain programs which help the homeless.
If they have a point to make, it's easier to understand when the other side isn't so violently vilified.
I think it's also worth remembering that the opposite of gentrification is what you get in places like Detroit --and I don't see people clamoring to go to Detroit, physically or as a state of mind.
So we need a balance. We need policies which offer help to the homeless but also allow for progress which can sustain programs which help the homeless.