For example, you can make it illegal to create ciphers longer than a certain value or not use the magic constants specified in the NSA specification in your algorithm.
An article with a paywall. There is nothing important in the free part, it is intentionally stretched, there is a lot of chatter and common words without any useful information.
> Sergei Glukhikh, 20, was arrested in September under a law that had come into force earlier that month, and which raised concerns about expanded surveillance and potential abuse by law enforcement.
The Moscow Times has the same relationship to Moscow as the RFA has to Chinese news.
This is a propaganda mouthpiece, thepurpose the purpose of which is to engage in cherrypicking, finding isolated cases and making a big deal out of a molehill.
If it's also going to be against Russia, it would be great.
>"found Glukhikh guilty and imposed a fine of 3,000 rubles ($38)."
"Glukhikh, who did not attend his sentencing hearing, has denied his guilt."
And also:
"FSB officer noticed Glukhikh searching for extremist content while riding next to him on the bus"
That is, an employee of the services saw a search for a banned organization engaged in the murder of Russians and the Russian-speaking population of Ukraine and reported it.
You must admit that this is not the same as just looking for information on Yandex.
And the parental comment refers specifically to the Yandex search, and not to isolated cases when an FSB agent suddenly stands behind you.
Keep in mind that millions of Russians search for information about VPN and the rest every day, openly discuss it on social networks and do not receive any punishment for it.
I'm sure you're experienced enough at using Yandex/Rambler/whatever to find other sources. What are those, btw? Соловьёв Live?
> You must admit that this is not the same as just looking for information on Yandex.
I must do no such thing. The other week I searched for the fascist Ivan Ilyin because I wanted to see what kind of ideas Putin built his ideology on. I've also read about the Russian Nazi paramilitary unit Rusich Group, responsible for the murder of Ukrainians. I've googled Maria Lvova-Belova, wanted by the International Criminal Court for kidnapping children. Do you think I should have been arrested for those?
I'm happy you guys can still search for VPNs, enjoy it while you can. Truly the pinnacle of democracy.
Yes, and? I'm perfectly fine with discussing it based on The Moscow Times article, it's the other commenter who disregarded it for being "against Russia" (I wish!). Since there are other sources that have reported on this, I suggested they search the runet for an officially-sanctioned outlet if that's what they prefer.
I did not ignore it, my comments are really based on the material of this article, I only pointed out that such a source is Russian news, in which RFA is Chinese news.
Unfortunately, from your next comment (you've collected a whole bingo there) I realized that I might have wasted my time on you.
This level of concern is corrected only if you want it yourself, no one from the outside can help you.
My statement that you can safely search for the necessary information on Yandex remains valid.
Those who have been using Linux for a long time have very useful terminals with syntax highlighting, auto-completion, typo correction and many other bells and whistles.
In addition, muscle memory has been developed and there is experience.
They don't realize that newbies don't have any of this, and it's very inconvenient to type commands in the terminal without it. You may not be able to copy and paste them the way they are used to (right mouse button or Ctrl-V)
The terminal in linux makes people hysterical and angry.
The problem could be partially solved by adding auto-completion and auto-correction to the default iso.
Considering that America has allowed hundreds of billions of dollars of money belonging to individuals in Russia to be stolen, I do not see the validity of your argument.
It was caused by unprovoked and illegal invasion of neighbouring country, that's tit for tat. They also seized assets of Nazi Germany when Hitler decided to go full yolo.
These are just words, excuses that hide the fact that they illegally stole funds that did not belong to them.
Can I read more about the seizure of German bank accounts? As far as I know, they (USA) continued to sponsor Germany until 1944. (through various branches.)
Some Swiss banks serviced Nazi accounts until 2020 and did not see any problems in this.
A tit for tat would have been Iraq had seized American assets in response to the US invasion and the theft of Iraq's gold assets.
Remind me, when did Russia invade the USA or the EU?)
in principle, this is true, if the case does not have a reliable basis, then it will not go to court. If we take this into account, then the magic numbers of 99% will disappear.
These are not only criminal cases, but also administrative and civil law relations.
in principle, there was no need to discuss this at all, usually those who do not understand the legal system and who have never been to court, cry about 99%.
reply