Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | tomjen3's commentslogin

It will certainly help - but its an extremely high bar. Almost all formal verification of software today is "does this pass the typechecker"?.

Now this captures some errors, but it doesn't really capture high level ones (is this program guaranteed to not deadlock is a hard one), and it doesn't capture the one that is important for business purposes (does this do what the customer wants). That requirement is more important than correctness (vitness all the software that is described as "crap", but is nonetheless widely used).

I don't think this is a required key to unlocking vibe coding. That seems to be easy: does this provide business value? And there the answer seems roughly to be "yes".


Aren't the best proofs very short?

"Best" is subjective. Proofs can get very long especially for the harder ones mathematicians are tackling these days.

In 2012 post on Facebook was from my friends.

Now they are from influencer pages.


But accessiblity on the frontend is to a large extend patterns - if it looks like a checkbox it should have the appropriate ARIA tag, and patterns are easy for an LLM.

That kind of pattern was easy before AI.

It's just… a lot of people don't see this on their bottom line. Or any line. My awareness of accessibility issues is the Web Accessibility Initiative and the Apple Developer talks and docs, but I don't think I've ever once been asked to focus on them. If anything, I've had ideas shot down.

What AI does do is make it cheap to fill in gaps. 1500 junior developers for the price of one, if you know how to manage them. But still, even there, they'd only be filling in gaps as well as the nature of those gaps have been documented in text, not the lived experience of people with e.g. limited vision, or limited joint mobility whose fingers won't perform all the usual gestures.

Even without that issue, I'd expect any person with a disability to describe an AI-developed accessibility solution as "slop": because I've had to fix up a real codebase where nobody before me had noticed the FAQ was entirely Bob Ross quotes (the app wasn't about painting, or indeed in English), I absolutely anticipate that a vibe-coded accessibility solution will do something equally weird, perhaps having some equivalent to "As a large language model…" or to hard-code some example data that has nothing to do with the current real value of a widget.


Not only can we not just do that (you did not even define what you mean), but China is coming out with models that are good enough for this purpose - and they are, because they are open, everywhere.

Thank you, this was very interesting. I knew about XHTML in EPUB, but not that it was extendible - I had assumed it was mostly frozen.

Others have requested a list of features supported in different E-readers. i second this request.


It’s a point to point vpn that works between devices even without a direct network connection.

Their personal free plan is more than enough.


I am apparently dumb. What benefit does this give you, other than a segregated network? Do us hotels typically have exposed Ethernet ports?


I always travel with my GL.iNet GL-MT3000 (Beryl AX) and this is what I use it for:

- My wife and I travel with multiple devices (laptops, phones, Chromecast...) and when we get to a hotel/Airbnb, I simply connect my Beryl AX to their network (it deals with captive portals btw) and all of our devices automatically connect.

- I changed the `/etc/hosts` directly in the router, meaning I can test my local servers under custom domains easily on my other devices like phones/tablets without apps like SquidMan.

- I route specific domains through specific VPNs. Government websites, streaming websites, AWS services, etc.

- I can plug in a 4G USB modem into it and it can automatically fallback to it if the main connection drops.

- It has built-in Tailscale support.


I am going to disagree with patio11 here. If someone asks you to pay with gift cards, its a scam.

Gift cards are the equivalent of buying dollars at 105 cents, but its not a scam, since everybody is upfront about the transaction.


That is not enough.

We need to make every EU law contiguent on subsequently being adopted by the people - and at a significant majority (say 75% of eligible voters).

Yes that means fewer new laws, which is not a bad thing when the EU people are so detached from their population.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: