For both of these scenarios, it seems to happen when the context limit is getting full and the context is summarized. I've found it usually works to respond with the right file, i.e. "great, let's apply those changes in @path/to/file", but it may also be a good time to return to an earlier conversation point by editing one of your previous messages. You might edit the message that got you the response with changes not linked to a specific file, including the file path in that prompt will usually get you back on track.
"William Peppé handed the gems, relics and reliquaries to the colonial Indian government: the bone relics went to the Buddhist King of Siam (Rama V). Five relic urns, a stone chest and most other relics were sent to the Indian Museum in Kolkata - then the Imperial Museum of Calcutta.
Only a small "portion of duplicates", which he was allowed to keep, remained in the Peppé family, he notes. (Sotheby's notes say Peppé was allowed to keep approximately one-fifth of the discovery.)
Sources told the BBC the auction house considers the "duplicates" to be original items considered surplus to those donated, which the "Indian government permitted Peppé to retain". "
If this is true, it doesn't sound "clearly stolen" to me. Frankly, if there was serious reason to doubt that story, I would have expected the article to quote somebody willing to say so, rather than just expressing vague unease and general hand-wringing about the optics of the situation.
I can't help but feel like this is a satirical send up of "tech bros solve farming," except it's not satire.
I am a software engineer, I also runs a small family farm. I have 3d printers and laser cutters and lots of aluminum extrusion and raspberry pis... but I keep those things indoors, away from the dirt, sun, and rain. I can't imagine a real farmer using a contraption like this. Tools have to be reliable to last. I have to replace my solid steel shovels every few years because they wear out, how is this supposed to work?
I'm both as well. Imagine all that maintenance of keeping a hobby electronics project outside, all just to remove maybe 5% of the effort of growing vegetables. You can't even grow anything tall with it.
If they have a solid planning software that accounts for crop rotation, companion planting, etc. then that's already a much better value proposition.
Lol dirt is going to get in all of it and it's very hard to clean extruded aluminum rails, not to mention how small those wheels were. How's it driven - belts / gears? How often are you going to disassemble and maintain this thing? what's the maintenance schedule like? I would bet it is more demanding than planting a 4x8 raised bed.
That said I still love the project. I don't think the point is to grow plants maximally efficiently at this point, it's a early release of something cool and it's open source.
So the YC board found out Altman would be CEO of a for-profit OpenAI when it was publicly announced, just like the OpenAI board found out about ChatGPT when it was publicly announced. Thanks for the clarification!
What in earth are you talking about? PG is clearly saying he was running both for years, everyone knew, everyone was happy, but when openai became a for profit, it was time to choose.
Nothing nefarious, nothing sneaky, no tricks, nada, ziltch.
The immense bias, bull, made up junk, and outright maliciousness in some of these replies is beyond disgusting.
You left out the part where PG wrote that Altman had already been doing two jobs for several years ("For several years he was running both YC and OpenAI").
OpenAI the non-profit was partly funded by YC or at least affiliated with "YC Research." So it is still odd for them to find out about the quasi-conversion to for-profit like that.
CEO isn’t that kind of job. I don’t have any love for Altman but this reasoning doesn’t fly. You can be CEO of multiple companies at once, and apparently he had been for some time.
>PG is clearly saying he was running _both_ for years,
Friendly clarification about "both" because the OpenAI structure is very confusing and muddies up the narrative.
(1) first in 2015, there was the 501c3 non-profit OpenAI entity. From the public statements, this was more of a "idealistic research & development" organization to create truly open and publicized machine learning data & algorithms so humanity wouldn't be beholden to big tech like Google "controlling AI". This is the entity that Elon Musk and others (including YC Jessica Livingston) donated $40+ million to and the one that Sam was "running for years" along with YC. Maybe this non-profit R&D gig seemed more like a "part-time" job to PG.
(2) then in 2019, OpenAI created a new for-profit OpenAI company (a subsidiary) to raise money and build proprietary products. Sam was then tapped to also run this for-profit company. This new entity is not part of the "running both for years". That's where PG said Sam needed to choose where to be full-time. The additional responsibilities of being the CEO for the new for-profit company was a change in circumstances.
> The immense bias, bull, made up junk, and outright maliciousness in some of these replies is beyond disgusting.
Imagine if you were in a classroom and some new students entered the room and all sat together in a group and were wearing walkie talkies, and then started shouting out comments non-stop at the teacher that seemed to have some non-constructive motive.
Don't want to ask you your name or location to preserve privacy, but do you happen to live near what used to be a really cool coffee shop, and do you have an awesome garage with a plasma cutter? If so I think you told me about this project a decade ago while we built a little backyard forge!
Central Italy here, and no, unfortunately I never lived near a cool coffee shop and I never had a garage with a plasma cutter, but talked about the idea to some friends roughly in 2011 so it is possible that the word traveled around.
My buddy was working on exactly the same project around then in Austin tx. He was trying to make it as a web app with access to location permissions, where the page's background color would change for each individual pixel in the virtual display. Concertgoers would visit the url and their phone would become a pixel in the screen. He was trying to figure out how to get better location resolution when we talked about it, sounds like you guys had similar ideas and both discovered the implementation was trickier than it initially seemed it would be. I wonder how many other folks worked on that idea around that time?
Hi, I also had this idea circa 2014. I realized it wouldn't work accurately enough given the GPS limitations (and my limitations as a programmer) at the time. I pivoted to encoding color instructions in a high-frequency range of an audio signal emitted through the audio system of the stadium. I had a prototype working, but it was inconsistent and did not warrant a contract with the client. I've had the itch to complete this app since then.
On top of that, IMO the vast majority of their value as a brand comes from the community that develops for and with the platform. See every review for the alternative SBC market (Orange Pi, Bana Pi, etc.) "Sure it's better/cheaper but they don't have the huge community..."
So, if they IPO, will they first be distributing equity to the community? Or are they just cash-grabbing a retirement play?
