We switched to Pulsetic monitoring a year ago, and when UptimeRobot first changed their pricing and terms, we made the move. Here’s the comparison table: https://pulsetic.com/uptimerobot-alternative/ . So far, everything has been great.
I think you plugin is useful, as I see it offers 15 locations, so I have asked to filter them by lower to highest and ask suggestions how to improve my website response time.
This is an excellent resource for small teams who want to create a startup without spending too much money. It can help them quickly create a decent landing page that attracts users to their service or product.
If it's anything like the McDonald's in the United States, the card readers need to be connected through the network rather than through USB. Because the software that is installed onto them does more than simply send out card numbers, there should not be an easy way to exploit them as card skimmers. The software that is loaded on them handles the transaction.
It is readable, simple to comprehend for engineering, product, and management; it adds no value to the game; and it positively rewards finishing what you started. It is exceedingly difficult to precisely forecast when a whole product will ship, much less when a complete feature will be released. However, if one breaks a feature down into its legible constituent components and then commits to completing just what is within that (which also necessitates any required communication in order to arrive at an understanding of the requirements), then over time one can become quite good at predicting what one will be able to get done in a sprint and better at only committing to what one believes they can actually complete.
It's intriguing that XFS, which lacks the integrity checks that ZFS or BTRFS offer, is the recommended filesystem for databases, even distributed ones like CochroachDB.
I don't have any experience with ZFS, and very little with BTRFS, but the reason I pick XFS is that has "just worked", out of the box, on every Linux distribution I've managed for about 20 years. Back then, it was one of the few choices that didn't have a static inode limit, and it could be grown while mounted. That was a big convenience on file servers when combined with LVM and/or hardware RAID. ZFS sounds hard to manage, I thought BTRFS was still eating peoples' data for a while, and XFS just keeps working fine.
The main log provides CoW-like functionality, & archive logs provide snapshot-like functionality. Having the DB & the file system duel over these responsibilities is trouble waiting to happen.
