>Yes, it’s there, but very much in the fineprint.

This is where it belongs, at best. He doesn't even have to disclose it. Prompting so that the ai writes the code faster than you is okay.

Yes, now generalize the theorem to any human to make it usable on a daily basis.

The error rate would still be improved overall and might make it a viable tool for the price depending on the usecase.

Well, it is the original poster that used vibe-coding as "AI-assisted engineering".

> I didn't see much concrete evidence this was noticeably better than 5.1

Did you test it?

No, I would like to but I don't see it in my paid ChatGPT plan or in the API yet. I based my comment solely off of what I read in the linked announcement.

Well, the case would still stand, wouldn't it? Unless C is free of these dozen common issues.

No, still too negatively connoted. "Writes" "Predicts" "caricatures" is closer.

Have we abandoned the term "generate" already?

Forgot about it, my human mind has its limits. I don't know about a "we" though. I'm not representative of anyone.

Didn't notice the username "dang_fan". Reading the usernames makes it even more funny.

"Show HN: AlgoDrill – Interactive drills to stop forgetting LeetCode patterns " by persistence_is_key

Can you explain the joke in that username?

Consider the subject of the post, not just the username in isolation.

I don't get it

"persistence is key" and a site to for persisting at leetcode.

this kills the joke, however.

I thought they asked about the dang_fan username.

The user seems to be struggling at leetcode, so he needs some persistence to get there until he is able to do it.

“stop forgetting LeetCode patterns”

“persistence” (in the data sense, rather than the personality trait sense) “is key”

it’s a double meaning, no? as the thing with leetcode is that the way to best it is persistently doing it.

Gemini 3 definitely is able to mimick some of our sense of humor.

I found this quite funny too: https://www.reddit.com/r/GeminiAI/comments/1pi28l7/i_asked_g...

Arguably a big part of comedy is mimicry. Humor often works by reinforcing in-group identity, playing up cultural stereotypes as seen here. So maybe we shouldn't be that surprised that LLMs can exhibit some genuine wittiness.

So, they should have kept it? Are you going to malign every action, even if it is positive?

What's the positive action here, showing ads to paying customers or making a hollow apology after they were caught?

Is anyone actually this oblivious?