So, uh, where precisely are you finding a sufficient # conservative professors to make that kind of statement? I'm curious as to where they're hiding...
Hydropower in Norway is dead, it's too effective, so we have to switch to worse options so that Europe can become less competitive and be more vulnerable to the predations of Russia and China.
My grandpa said that it was not unusual to see 5-10pounders crawling around in the shallows at night...in the 1920s, in Narragansett Bay, not even offshore.
Came to post this; Ballistol works brilliantly; and can also be used as a leather conditioner, wound dressing, & marinade for carne de cheval, with the addition of some juniper berries and a little rosemary.
It relates, insofar as the driver was not charged, and in fact managed to run for president (and almost won the Democratic nomination) several years later, which a charge of manslaughter generally precludes.
...but your top post didn't ask any questions; certainly not ones that would justify a detailed answer.
It was several assertions, plus your admission of confusion. I mean, there are no stupid questions, but there wasn't even a question there, so I don't blame anyone for thinking you're communicating poorly.
I wasn't accused of communicating poorly. I was accused of lying about reading a text file and having some kind of ulterior motive for my own opinions.
Furthermore, advanced readers are generally able to infer from "I am not sure why x" that a similar flow of discussion might be as feasible as if it were phrased "why x?".
As though that were necessary. There's plenty of room in this comment box for questions better fleshed out than "why x?". Are you expecting advanced readers, or clairvoyant ones?
reply