Jetbrains+refactoring - don’t get your hopes up. In Android Studio refactoring was broken for 5+ years and ticket is one of most voted. And nothing happened.

How can you post those emails and make a joke out of them - they have this footer that clearly states that if you are not a recipient you must delete the email immediately. Whole business world have this footer for a reason, for situations like this, so you can be sure your emails will not go public.

Although in principle I agree with the sentiment, sometimes for difficult illnesses we need to accept the side effects of the cure.

?

The woman is pushing the cat's lip up with her finger. It's not painful to the cat.

Of course if you put the leg there it’s confusing. Just give it AGIP logo as a test.

That has nothing to do with actual bad UX, those are made up UX… jokes? pranks? I don’t know how to call it.

But it shows a bigger problem: the generation of designers grew up on abhorrent design that Figma normalised. They don’t know what bad is, they won’t recognise bad. Only outrageous made-up UX “pranks” are bad to them. How about showing an actual bad UX of Figma on their podcast?

Lowering the plank towards a fantasy bad UX makes any UX above it good.

What is you tell it to end output with certain character?

It is a distraction from its intended purpose

A Norwegian band

Use Google AI Studio to submit requests, and to remove watermark, open browser development tools and right click on request to “watermark_4” image and select to block it. And from next generation there will be no watermark!

So the watermark is being added to the image on the client-side? That's pretty bad

That sounds dangerous honestly. Watermarks should be mandatory for AI generated images.

This only applies to the visible watermark on the corner, which you could crop anyways. If I’m not mistaken, all images generated by Google models have an invisible watermark: https://deepmind.google/models/synthid/

How would you enforce that when it’s actually important? Any “bad actor” could just open photoshop and remove it. Or run a delobotimized model which doesn’t watermark.

Can't believe that worked, thanks!

> It is very easy, particularly for those who are very progressive, to blame the men

What it means to be progressive became so distorted, it’s almost as bad as conservative, in most cases “progressive” groups and parties are places for willing and thinking people to defuse and not actually do or contribute anything.

The meaning of political terms are always shifting. The mainstream political beliefs within either political party circa the 1990s were in stark conflict with what they are today. The gulf between the 1960s and the 1990s is just as big.

To minimize confusion, unless I say otherwise, I try to use political terms in accord with how they are generally used today.

And be the richest man in the cemetery?