I've thought the same thing. I always feel more balanced when including the challenge of uneven terrain. When I was a kid I used to be able to run full speed through forrest litter.
'code that doesn't do anything previously built software could'
I have a hard time understanding what you mean here? Is it just hyperbole but surely the 'code' must do something that previously built software could do. Or do you mean to say it's rarely any better than what it replaced?
When software was paid for at a wage that was like a construction worker back in the day. Sure there could be "some" improvements, but we went a bit nuts making a millions of React developers.
While I generally subscribe to the idea that the editors of A New Hope helped a lot with the final product, it's massively unfair to say that Lucas wasn't a good storyteller, Campbell didn't help directly with a New Hope and it was scripted by Lucas - ie it's his story.
Lucas got a lot of feedback from people over several years as he revised his initial concept.
https://starwars.fandom.com/wiki/The_Star_Wars_rough_draft The first version was not very Campbellian and did not have "Use the force." He also didn't come up with the "I am your father" story arc until after finishing the first movie.
I think that was the joke. It's obvious Star Wars stole a lot of ideas from Dune. But many people think it's the opposite since star wars predates the Dune movies.
So I'm unfamiliar with this so let me ask a few dumb questions but first of all great job! My questions are - If you didn't do this work how would you use this soc? When I search, it is stated that it supports OpenGL and Vulkan but was that just ' in theory? ' How can a SOC developer make a product without driver support? Don't they risk messing up and having hardware that doesn't work properly?
You see they don't care. They give you a OS image on Google Drive with a forked kernel and call it a day.
Silicon hardware companies have one of the dumbest business models, when it comes to programmable chips. They want to sell chips, because it makes them money through sales. They don't want to spend money on software support, because you cannot link the software to a sale. So software to them costs money and produces no benefits.
But when you think about it even a little bit, you start to wonder. Who is going to write commercial grade software for a commercial hardware product that they don't make money off? Nobody. What you'll get is an anemic volunteer effort at best. The volunteers might even do a good job, but since they are not involved in the hardware development process, they will always be playing catch up and take a year until the latest hardware is supported. So even in the theoretical best case scenario the hardware will be sold when it is least attractive.
This business model is completely illogical and Nvidia doesn't follow it. Instead Nvidia proactively invested in a software ecosystem for their hardware, thereby leading them to their current valuation.
The same applies to Intel and x86. People prefer x86 boxes, because the software ecosystem of drivers, UEFI/booting and so on is fully mature, whereas ARM SBCs are a fragmented mess.
reply