Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | GJim's commentslogin

Total opposite here.

If you can't be bothered with a simple cover letter (a paragraph or two is fine) highlighting why you are a good fit and just send a CV..... Frankly, it comes across as low effort spamming.


As someone currently looking for a new job, I stopped bothering with cover letters because they didn't make the faintest of differences. After many dozens of rejections I am just burnt out about writing them.

This fucking shit, which really boils down to a humiliation ritual focusing on why you """deserve to be here""", needs to fucking end. You are no more deserving than the applicant.

If you consider briefly highlighting the relevant parts of your experience to a potential employer as "fucking shit", then perhaps you are unsuitable for the role being offered.

I am sure, you hold the employer to the same standards. For example disclosing salary range information beforehand, or writing rejection letters afterwards, so applicants going through the trouble of doing their part aren't wasting their time and energy.

Right?


"lol", said GJim. "lmao", he muttered.

translated: stop questioning why the economy depends on the Infant Crushing Machine continuing to Crush Infants

> It also looks hopelessly boomerish

Nice bit of ageism there.

Frankly, if desiring to speak to the engineers hiring me is dismissed as "boomerish", then I'm hardly surprised recruiting is in such a mess.

In this case, the short conversation VerifiedReports had proved that, no, he wouldn't be happy working there. QED.


> I wonder if some kind of big floating energy station could be a thing

Congratulations, you have just re-invented offshore (floating) wind turbines. https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ftsa&q=floating+wind+turbines+&ia=...

> I guess you don't have to pay anyone for the space or worry about too many regulations etc.

I'm ammused you think offshore energy is lawless. It's the same assumption that had the entire maritime community laughing at the clowns behind 'Seasteding" and the amusing MS Satoshi 'cryptoship'.


I found your reply unnecessarily snarky. The possibility I'l pondering would be to have a facility in deep ocean, far away from any countries coastline, but near shipping lanes.

Not without a fake ID. The drinking age is 18 is Aus.


> unless there are overtakes in progress

I don't think F1 cars have overtaken each other since the 1990's.

If you want to see overtaking, stick to watching the Superbikes instead.


> I had to agree that I was not a terrorist organisation's nor in a country where encryption can not be exported to.

Don't forget when flying to the USA, ticking the box to say you won't try to overthrow the government.

I'm sure that clause has stopped many an invading army in their tracks.


> I am at a loss for words. This wasn't a sophisticated attack.

To be fair, data security breaches seldom are.


You are either trolling, or utterly clueless when it comes to fell walking.

(Perhaps sir would like to search 'Ordnance Survey Maps').


> Sherlock’s mental health and addiction recovery

As I said downthread.....

In Conan Doyle's books, Holmes was a user of cocaine, not an addict.

This modern desire to portray Holmes as a drug addict says far more about our own times.


When Doyle wrote most of the Holmes stories cocaine was a popular and novel new drug, it wasn't until later that it's risks became widely known. In one of his later stories, "The Adventure of the Missing Three-Quarter", Doyle portrays it as an addiction that Watson weaned him of, but is still concerned that his friend may fall back into.

"For years I had gradually weaned him from that drug-mania which had threatened once to check his remarkable career. Now I knew that under ordinary conditions he no longer craved for this artificial stimulus, but I was well aware that the fiend was not dead but sleeping, and I have known that the sleep was a light one and the waking near when in periods of idleness I have seen the drawn look upon Holmes’ ascetic face, and the brooding of his deep-set and inscrutable eyes. Therefore I blessed this Mr. Overton, whoever he might be, since he had come with his enigmatic message to break that dangerous calm which brought more peril to my friend than all the storms of his tempestuous life."

- https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Return_of_Sherlock_Holmes...


In the One True TV Holmes https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0086661/?ref_=nm_flmg_job_1_acc... this is even shown as a tension between Holmes and Watson, with Watson showing the modern view.

Of course Brett was in fact completely out of it for much of the filming on all sorts of things.


A few things; one, even if it's not strictly speaking true that cocaine use always leads to addiction every single time, we know now better than in Victorian era England how often it does, and Doyle not having been a cocaine user may have lost some of the elements of how cocaine is addictive and what it looks like. I hate to say that there is some moral duty to show a protagonist using cocaine as having a problem with its use that needs to be overcome, but I do think it'd be strange too to keep what was effectively this SMBC comic (https://smbc-comics.com/index.php?db=comics&id=191) as Holmes' use of coke.

Secondly, the stories that mention coke use are all written from the perspective of Holmes' best friend, who we'd expect to be biased towards writing about his friend in a positive light. I don't think this is accidental. Watson quotes him effectively saying "I just do coke because life is so mundane and boring, and not stimulating enough for me" which is nearly the exact same justification and thought process used by like, every addict and if not a word-for-word quote, then at least very similar for Chris Moltisanti's justification of his own addiction to Tony Soprano.

It may not be an exact rendering of what was in the books but it is extremely natural modification to make, where otherwise we'd have flat Marty Stu character who is talking in ways that seem very consistent with at least problematic use and yet who's not addicted. "Our own times" have dealt with at least 100 years of coke addiction, 50 years of crack so maybe we're just not naive enough to believe that a guy who's saying "my friend just takes it when he's bored, but he's bored all the time because his mind is too sharp for this dull world" isn't a problematic user or addict.


I recall when I first visited the USA and walked into an American bookshop...

... the selves of 'self-help' books I found utterly bizarre. It was very much an eye-opener into the differences of our cultures.


"Self-help" is more like a modern folk religion than anything to do with actual psychology.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: